Google
Click-here for a FREE copy of Emotional Free Trading E-book Increase your sales by 100% GUARANTEED! CLICK HERE

Friday, April 27, 2007

How to invest like Warren Buffett's

Increasingly worried that the Dow Jones Industrial Average ($INDU) is too expensive after reaching a record closing high of 12,961 on April 20? Sitting on cash waiting for the market to correct and yet fearful that the rally will leave you behind?

Well, then, let legendary value investor Warren Buffett's recent purchase of 11% of railroad Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNI, news, msgs) -- worth about $3 billion -- remind you there is another way to think about the stock market that doesn't involve attempts to predict market tops or bottoms.

The key to Buffett's buy is a measure called return on invested capital (ROIC), which indicates a company's power to grow its business profitably for investors over time. If a company's ROIC is high enough, it puts the massive power of compounding on the long-term investor's side. If return on invested capital isn't high enough, no share price is low enough to justify purchase by a long-term buy-and-hold investor.

The utility of Buffett's logic and the ROIC measure isn't limited to railroad stocks. It's especially well-suited to today's equity markets and increasingly global economy, and it's a great guide for picking stocks for your portfolio when the stock market indexes are at historical highs.

Of course, to apply Buffett's logic you first have to understand exactly why Buffett bought shares of Burlington Northern and two other railroads now.

The fundamental reasons an investor wants to own railroad shares in his April 18 column, "Buffett on the right track: Buying railroad stocks." But although these fundamentals explain why Buffett would want to own railroad shares, they don't explain why he'd buy them at current prices.

At first -- and even second -- glance, the timing seems odd even for Warren Buffett, who says he never tries to time the stock market. Even though Buffett bought his stake in Burlington Northern a few months ago, he was still loading up near an all-time high for the railroad's shares and near an all-time high for the Dow. To make things even more puzzling, he was buying as the U.S. economy seemed to be slowing. Railroads are notoriously cyclical stocks that do well when economic growth is speeding up and head rapidly downward when growth slows.

So, for example, Burlington Northern shares hit a high in April 1999 and bottomed in February 2000 as investors began to anticipate an economic slowdown. Real growth in the U.S. economy was a very robust 3.7% in 2000 and sank to a barely visible 0.1% in 2001.

It is not possible for me to believe that an experienced investor like Buffett has forgotten the cyclical record of a railroad stock such as Burlington Northern. So what was he thinking as he pulled the trading trigger and put $3 billion into this cyclical stock at what looks like a market and economic peak?

In my opinion, he was thinking that, as he has so often reminded investors, he doesn't buy stocks; he buys companies. And if you're buying a railroad company, this is exactly the right time.

Why? Because thanks to all those fundamental factors mentioned in Brush's column, the company's return on invested capital has finally inched above its cost of capital.

For years, railroads, even such recently well-run railroads as Burlington Northern, have earned a lower return on the capital they invest in their business than that capital cost them in the marketplace. That's not a recipe for bankruptcy -- a company can chug along in this position for pretty much forever because, thanks to operating leverage, it doesn't have to invest a dollar of capital to produce a dollar in earnings.

But earning less than the market cost of your capital sure doesn't encourage reinvesting profits in your business: The return is so low that it's more attractive to pay dividends or buy back shares. And that eliminates the power of compounding from the company's growth. Sure, the company can throw off lots of cash, as railroads do, but since they aren't reinvesting that cash, the business and the cash flow aren't growing at a compounded rate every year.

Standard & Poor's puts the weighted average cost of capital for Burlington Northern at 8.5%. The company didn't make that on average over the past five years. Look at the company's investment returns on our site. The five-year average is just 4.5% for the company and the railroad industry.

What our data don't show is that Burlington Northern and railroads in general haven't earned a return on invested capital above their cost of capital for considerably longer than five years. The last time these businesses were consistently that profitable was in the early years of the 20th century, roughly 90 years ago.

But that's been changing recently. Return on invested capital has climbed to 6.8% over the past 12 months. And in the past few months, return on invested capital has grown even more, so that it is either close to or actually exceeds the company's cost of capital. Railroads as a whole are riding this trend. In the past few months, Canadian National Railway (CNI, news, msgs) and Norfolk Southern (NSC, news, msgs) have also recorded returns on invested capital near their costs of capital. CSX Corp. (CSX, news, msgs) and Union Pacific (UNP, news, msgs) seem likely to pass this mark in the next few quarters.

So Buffett bought into the railroad sector just at the point where railroads could put the power of compounding to work: reinvesting this year's earnings and earning a high enough return to justify investing the earnings on those reinvested earnings next year.

For a long-term investor like Buffett, that turning point in a company's (and sector's) fortunes is more important than any temporary spike in the stock price -- because reinvesting and compounding each year's earnings grows the business at a rate that, in the long term, overwhelms any effect of buying at a temporary top.

This analysis -- and I readily concede it's only my reconstruction of what might be Buffett's thought processes -- would lead me to prefer Union Pacific to Burlington Northern. The latter railroad has raced ahead at the front of the ROIC pack because the company invested during the years when it was tough to justify investing in double-tracking, which allows trains going in opposite directions to pass each other more easily. The company now has far more of its routes double-tracked than a competitor like Union Pacific. That makes Burlington Northern more efficient now, but it also means that Union Pacific has more future opportunity to reinvest capital playing catch-up.

Monday, April 16, 2007

Bull Put Diagonal Spread for Earnings announcement


Profile: Steel Dynamics, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the manufacture and sale of carbon steel products in the United States. It operates in three segments: Steel Operations, Fabrication Operations, and Steel Scrap and Scrap Substitute Operations. Steel Dynamics was founded in 1993 and is headquartered.
Trading Stance: This is going to be a great lesson for all of you who have never held a stock through earnings and profited. You’ll see the surprises if any, the immediate volatility changes in the options and the actions needed to be taken if a reversal occurs.That said lets look at the stocks position as it sits at the one year and five year high.Even though we’ve initially entered a bullish trade we do expect a bit of profit taking to step in (eventually), that is why we’ve used puts instead of calls since a mysterious reversal could always be triggered. So for now we’ll see what the news will bring us on Tuesday and of course this next week is April expiration, that too could be exciting but shouldn’t affect our May position adversely.

Sunday, April 15, 2007

Control your Money

The first and most important rule of trading real money is to use only "risk money." Risk money is money that you can afford to lose. It would not make you happy if you did lose it, but your life would go on without any change. In other words, risk money is money that is not needed for any necessity. As we transition from paper trading to real money trading, we must not use the rent money, mortgage money, grocery money, car payment money, insurance premium money, or tuition money. If that is all we have, it is not yet time to trade real money. Using money to trade that is needed for some necessity is dangerous and can cloud judgment. It places undue pressure on us.

As we begin trading, we must understand it is a business; successful traders rarely are gamblers. They do everything they can to put the odds in their favor. In addition to using only risk money, they carefully manage the money they are trading. One way to manage money for the beginning trader with a small account is to make equal dollar trades. If the trader is starting with $5,000 for example, each trade might be $500 or $250. What we don't want to do is make one trade $2,500 and the next $250. How could we possibly know which one is going to be successful? Generally, Murphy's Law goes into operation and we have a big loss on the $2,500 trade and a small gain on the $250 trade. Trading in that fashion soon takes the trader out of the game. Our first objective is to stay in the game. Making equal dollar trades helps us do that. Even if we lost all the money risked on one trade it would not be the end of the world. Of course, if we have a good exit plan, it would be unlikely that we could lose everything invested on the trade. On the other hand, if we placed a large portion of our money at risk on a single trade, it could end our career.

That sad story is all about money management and greed. If we manage our money properly, we remove a large part of the risk and prevent our greed from enticing us to do what the fellow in my example did. As we begin to trade real money, we are still building our confidence. Our paper trading may have been very successful, but it just isn't the same. Now, something important is on the line. Take it easy. Build confidence with equal dollar trades. If you lose part of your money on a small trade, so what? You will have losing trades so keep the losses small.

I believe an even better way to manage trading money is to use equal percentage trades rather than equal dollar trades. That is difficult to do with a small account, but can definitely be utilized as your account grows. I personally favor making trades where only 3% to 5% of risk money is placed at risk in any given trade. When losses are incurred and the account value drops, the next trade automatically is made for a lesser amount and when gains are made, greater amounts automatically are invested.

This seemingly simple device of managing money can build confidence, protect assets, and enable the trader to stay in the game.